Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rik De Voest vs Andre Begemann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Voest vs Begemann analysis and find out who is favored!
Rik De Voest vs Andre Begemann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Voest 0 - 0 Begemann
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Voest has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Begemann has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Voest, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Begemann has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Voest has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Begemann has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Voest has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Begemann winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Voest has played against opponents with an average rank of while Begemann has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Voest has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Begemann has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Voest has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Begemann has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
39
Age
R
Plays
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Rik De Voest Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Rik de Voest
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF | 7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Rik de Voest
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Karol Beck
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Min-Hyoek Cho
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Andre Begemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Andre Begemann
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andre Begemann
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Begemann
Player
Jordan Thompson
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andre Begemann
Player
Chien-Hsun Lo
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
73%
(
29 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Begemann
Player
Yu Hsiang Chiu
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Andre Begemann
Player
Jui-Chen Hung
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Yuichi Sugita
Player
Andre Begemann
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Begemann
Player
Shuichi Sekiguchi
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
8
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Voest Vs Begemann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
